LEGGI
BENI IN PERICOLO
INTERVENTI E RECENSIONI
RASSEGNA STAMPA
COMUNICATI DELLE ASSOCIAZIONI
EVENTI
BIBLIOGRAFIA
STORIA e FORMAZIONE del CODICE DEI BENI CULTURALI E DEL PAESAGGIO
LINK
CHI SIAMO: REDAZIONE DI PATRIMONIOSOS
BACHECA DELLE TESI
per ricevere aggiornamenti sul sito inserisci il tuo indirizzo e-mail
patrimonio sos
in difesa dei beni culturali e ambientali

stampa Versione stampabile

Londra. Would the 'royal' Salvator Mundi please stand up?
MARTIN BAILEY
The Art Newspaper, 28/11/2018

Pushkin Museums Giampietrino painting may be the one listed in inventory of Charles Is collection, rather than the Abu Dhabi work




Fresh doubts are emerging over the English royal provenance of Leonardo da Vincis Salvator Mundi (dated around 1500), which was bought a year ago for Abu Dhabi. New evidence has revealed that another painting of the same subject, now in Moscows Pushkin State Museum of Fine Arts, is more likely to be the one recorded in the historic inventories.
Desmond Shawe-Taylor, the surveyor of the Queens Pictures at the Royal Collection, admits that it is far from certain that the recently sold Salvator Mundi is the one once owned by Englands kings. He tells The Art Newspaper: There are several references in inventories of the time of Charles I and Charles II to a Leonardo that might well be a Salvator Mundi, but it is unclear whether they refer to the painting recently sold by Christies, the one now attributed to Giampietrino in the Pushkin Museum or another, unidentified picture.
The Pushkins Salvator Mundi is on a panel that has a CR (Charles Rex) mark with a crown branded into the back of the poplar, which proves that it was once owned by Charles I. This evidence, which was overlooked when the Abu Dhabi picture was sold by Christies, was noted by Ben Lewis, who is writing a book, The Last Leonardo, due to be published by Harper Collins next April. He is convinced that the Pushkin painting raises serious doubts as to whether the Abu Dhabi picture is the one recorded in royal inventories.

Most of Charles Is art collection was sold off during the Civil War. In the 19th century, when the Russian Salvator Mundi was owned by the Moscow-based Mosolov family, it was attributed to Leonardo. The picture was acquired by the Pushkin in 1924 and is now regarded as being by Giampietrino, a Leonardo follower, and dated to sometime up to his death in 1549.
The royal provenance of the Abu Dhabi painting is much more problematic, since there is no CR branded into the reverse of the walnut panel. The back was apparently thinned and inserted into a cradle, most likely in the 19th century. Dianne Modestini, the restorer of the Abu Dhabi Salvator Mundi, says that the panel had been planed, probably in the 19th century, and this would have removed any collectors marks that might have been on the reverse.
Between 1649 and 1651, an inventory was compiled of the collection of Charles I, following his execution. There are two possible references to a Salvator Mundi by Leonardo. The first reads: A peece of Christ done by Leonardo at £30, Sold to Stone 23 Oct. 1651. Although the subject is not specified, it could well be a Salvator Mundi. The second reference is to A lords figure in halfe, £80, with an added note and Leonardo da Vinci, sold to Bass 19 Dec 1651. The lord is most likely to refer to Christ, and not to an aristocrat.
The Christies experts for the November 2017 sale were apparently only aware of the first reference and did not know about the Pushkin picture, so they linked their Salvator Mundi with the first referencethereby claiming that it had probably once been owned by Charles I. Indeed, in their catalogue, the chapter on provenance was entitled A peece of Christ done by Leonardo. When the picture entered Charles IIs collection, the inventory records a Leonardo da Vinci Christ with a globe in one hand and holding up the other.

The royal provenance suggested that its picture had been in the English royal collection in the first half of the 17th century, which bolstered the Leonardo attribution. This probably increased its perceived value, and it fetched a record $450m when it sold on 15 November 2017, going to a Gulf buyer.
Niko Munz, a specialist on the collection of Charles I, now believes that with this new evidence, it is likely that the peece of Christ refers to the Pushkin picture.
The Art Newspaper has already reported that Christies suggestion that the Abu Dhabi picture might have been owned earlier by the French royal family and brought to England by Henrietta Maria on her marriage in 1625 is also doubtful (September 2018, p1); there is now evidence that the picture could have been with the Duke of Hamilton.
Meanwhile, mystery surrounds the display of the Abu Dhabi picture. On 2 September, the emirates department of culture and tourism announced the postponement of the works unveiling at Louvre Abu Dhabi, promising that more details will be announced soon. There was speculation that this might take place on the first anniversary of the opening of Louvre Abu Dhabi on 11 November, but no news was released.
It remains unclear whether the delay is over payment or ownership issues, or over conservation or attributional issues. The Louvre in Paris is presumably hoping to display the painting in its major Leonardo show, due to open in autumn 2019, but this remains unconfirmed.

https://www.theartnewspaper.com/news/would-the-royal-salvator-mundi-please-stand-up


news

15-02-2019
RASSEGNA STAMPA aggiornata al giorno 15 febbraio 2019

14-02-2019
Appello. Contro lo smantellamento dello Stato Italiano

13-01-2019
Per unarcheologia fuori dallimpasse. Lettera al Ministro Bonisoli di API (Archeologi Pubblico Impiego)

11-01-2019
Sulla riforma delle Soprintendenze e dei musei di archeologia. Dichiarazione di archeologi accademici Lincei

29-12-2018
Per un rafforzamento delle soprintendenze uniche

29-12-2018
A proposito dell'appello agli archeologi: "Firme e coerenza" di Pier Giovanni Guzzo

18-12-2018
APPELLO AGLI ARCHEOLOGI

28-11-2018
Nell'anniversario dei Washington Principles. Lo Stato italiano ha fatto poco per la restituzione dei beni culturali di proprietà ebraica

18-09-2018
Il Ministro Bonisoli: abolire la storia dell'arte

16-09-2018
Le mozioni dell'VIII Congresso Nazionale di Archeologia Medievale

14-09-2018
Manifesto della mostra sulle leggi razziali e il loro impatto in un liceo triestino.La censura del Comune

12-09-2018
Bando Premio Silvia Dell'orso: il 30 settembre scadono i termini per candidarsi

03-09-2018
Appello per la salvaguardia dellArchivio e del patrimonio culturale delle Acciaierie di Piombino

24-08-2018
A due anni dal terremoto in centro Italia

08-08-2018
Comitato per la Bellezza. Altro palazzone di 6 piani in piena riserva naturale del Litorale romano

24-07-2018
Da Emergenza Cultura: San Candido (BZ), uno sfregio che si poteva e doveva evitare

21-07-2018
Inchiesta de "L'Espresso" di Francesca Sironi: Il ministro Alberto Bonisoli e la scuola offshore

20-07-2018
Associazione Nazionale Archeologi. MIBAC: il titolo non è unopinione!

08-07-2018
Su Eddyburgh un intervento di Maria Pia Guermandi sull'Appia Antica

13-06-2018
Disponibile la relazione di Giuliano Volpe sull'attività del Consiglio Superiore

12-06-2018
Lettera aperta al Sig. Ministro dei Beni Culturali dott. Alberto Bonisoli: Per un futuro all'archeologia italiana

04-06-2018
Dalla rete: sul nuovo governo e sul nuovo ministro dei Beni culturali

19-05-2018
Sul contratto M5S - Lega vi segnaliamo...

17-05-2018
Cultura e Turismo: due punti della bozza Di Maio - Salvini

15-05-2018
Sulla Santa Bibiana di Bernini: intervento di Enzo Borsellino

13-05-2018
Premio Francovich 2018 per il miglior museo/parco archeologico relativo al periodo medievale

04-05-2018
Nella sezione "Interventi e recensioni" abbiamo pubblicato un contributo di Franco Pedrotti sul depuratore della piana di Pescasseroli: una sconfitta del protezionismo italiano

01-05-2018
Archistorie: rassegna di films sull'architettura dell'Associazione Silvia Dell'Orso

30-04-2018
Nella sezione "Interventi e recensioni", abbiamo pubblicato un contributo di Vittorio Emiliani: Appena 11 giardinieri per Villa Borghese. Ma l'erba "privata" non è meglio

26-04-2018
Roma. Il nuovo prato di piazza di Spagna non regge, il concorso ippico migra al Galoppatoio

Archivio news